Week 6 Transcripts.pdf
(
107 KB
)
Pobierz
The Addicted Brain Transcripts – Week 6
Video 6.1
Today we begin the very important topic of vulnerability, and this lecture will
include an overview of things we’ll discuss in more detail in later lectures.
Vulnerability addresses the question of will I become an addict, or will you become
an addict? Let’s revisit this image from week one. The image shows the same person
before and after becoming involved with methamphetamine. Becoming involved
with drugs is a very serious and often deadly proposition. If we can prevent it, we
must try. Thus, the study of vulnerability is very important.
If we compare large groups of drug users with large groups of non-‐users, we see
differences. The differences associated with taking drugs are called risk factors or
vulnerability factors. These are the factors that appear to make you vulnerable to
drug use. We don’t have a complete understanding of vulnerability. We can’t write
an equation for and precisely determine if you will or will not become an addict.
Vulnerability and risk are tendencies and nothing more.
Fortunately there are also protective factors that we can also uncover by comparing
drug users with nonusers.
Why do we care? Why do we want to identify risk factors and what makes people
vulnerable? Well, the obvious answer is that we want to protect ourselves and each
other. If individuals have risk factors, they can assess if they need to be proactive
and self-‐protective. We can warn and help friends who are in danger, and we can
also try to compensate for risk factors. In addition, prevention resources can be
directed at the most vulnerable populations to be most effective.
So there are many reasons to identify the risk factors that we face.
What are these vulnerability or risk factors? An important one is our biology. Do
members of a family take drugs? Are there inherited factors? We will discuss
heritability factors, but let me say in advance that inherited risk is not fully
determining. If your parents were drug addicts, it does not mean for certain that you
The Addicted Brain Transcripts -‐ Week 6
will become an addict. It seems that genetics have about a 50% influence on the
process of addiction. This knowledge comes from detailed studies of genetics and
drug abuse.
The personality and overall health of the person can contribute to vulnerability. It’s
known that comorbid or coexisting health problems often occur at the same time as
drug addiction and they likely influence drug taking.
Risk-‐taking and impulsive behavior are personality traits that are also risk factors.
Finally, the environment plays a very major role. Are drugs available? Is there peer
pressure or stress?
All of these can be somewhat interrelated.
Let’s consider some important and well-‐appreciated risk factors. There’s genetic
predisposition, personality traits and temperament, the age at first exposure to
drugs, coexisting health problems, attempts at self-‐medication, and impaired
judgment, which can be caused by the drugs themselves. All of these will be
discussed this week in more detail.
What about environmental risk factors? Well, availability of drugs is a big one. If
drugs weren’t available, there wouldn’t be drug addiction.
And let’s not forget stress. Stress is an extremely important risk factor.
Social status can affect drug taking, particularly when it involves stress. Peer
pressure in an adolescent population can be a very strong risk factor. And drug
awareness, even advertising for legal drugs, can be a risk factor.
What about protective factors? All of the following seem to be involved with lower
drug use. Self-‐control, academic competence, antidrug information in schools,
strong positive neighborhood attachments, actively compensating for risk factors,
some genetics can be protective, parents’ attitudes and the kind of home they
provide can be protective, and animal studies have shown us that enriched
environments can be protective as well. In the home, enforcement of limits and
The Addicted Brain Transcripts -‐ Week 6
discipline, forming strong bonds with children, and monitoring children seem to
help. It's comforting to know that we can take active steps to reduce risk.
All of these factors will say a lot about who can potentially become an addict.
Please don’t forget to examine the review questions at the end of this lecture.
Video 6.2
In the last lecture, I showed you a list of some of the biological, physiological, and
developmental risk factors that have been discovered. Today, we are going to look at
genetic predisposition in greater detail.
It is clear that genetics do contribute to the risk for drug addiction. Stated simply,
this means that if your parents or other family members have abused or are abusing
drugs, then the chances or the risk that you will also abuse drugs increases.
The best data for this comes from what we call cross adoption studies. Sons of
alcoholics adopted at birth to nonalcoholic families have a fourfold greater
probability of becoming alcoholic than their stepbrothers. Conversely, sons of
nonalcoholic parents adopted and raised by alcoholic families did not tend to
become alcoholics even when their stepbrothers did.
These studies and a large number of many other studies like them, indicate that
genes are involved in becoming a drug addict. But it's also been shown that genes do
NOT totally determine your drug-‐related life. They can influence drug taking but
they do not by themselves fully determine it. You cannot get away with saying that I
take drugs simply because my parents do or did.
Let’s continue to talk about genetics. We have talked about the fact that genes are
found in DNA, which is found in chromosomes.
The Addicted Brain Transcripts -‐ Week 6
A mutation is a change in the DNA sequence. It could be a change in a single
nucleotide, a duplication of a sequence, an insertion of a sequence, a deletion of a
sequence, or a copy or repair error.
Mutations can have an affect on function. This isn’t surprising because a mutation in
a gene is likely going to affect the protein made from it. There can be a loss of
function, which means that the gene product has no or a lesser function as a result of
the mutation.
There can be a gain of function where the new product has an improved function.
The mutation can result in a dominant negative, which means that the gene product
antagonizes the original gene and its product.
A lethal mutation leads to the death of an individual, and a back mutation is a
mutation that results in the original gene.
A harmful mutation decreases the health and performance of the individual. A
beneficial mutation does the opposite. A neutral mutation has no effect on the
individual. And the effect of mutation might be mixed, in that it could be beneficial in
some way and perhaps harmful in another way.
We will be using the word polymorphism. This refers to the simultaneous existence,
in a population, of different mutations. In other words, your genes may not be
exactly the same as mine even though we function about the same. These mutations
occurred in our ancestors and are passed down. And your ancestors are different
from mine.
SNPs, or single nucleotide polymorphisms, are used in studies of heritability. An
example of a SNP is shown in the image. Some of us might carry the GC version of
the gene while others of us might carry the AT version of the gene. Obviously the
SNPs we are considering are not lethal, because those having them would die. But
The Addicted Brain Transcripts -‐ Week 6
SNPs can affect the function of the protein because they can affect the makeup and
structure of the protein.
One of the versions of the protein might be found more often in addicts, for example.
In that case, one could say that it might partly cause the addiction. It would be at
least associated with addiction.
Here are some examples of SNPs that have been associated with addicts. A SNP in
the mu opiate receptor protein is found more frequently in a group of heroin
addicts. A SNP occurring in a dopamine receptor is more frequent in alcoholics. It is
not yet clear how much the different SNPs influence addiction or why they should.
This is a current area of research. Also we know that an association does not prove
that it’s a cause. Nevertheless, associations of SNPs with addiction have been very
useful in exploring the molecular basis of the disorder.
Let’s consider the genetics of nicotine receptors and their role in smoking. In week
three, I mentioned that nicotine receptors were composed of subunits, each made by
different genes. And I mentioned that nicotine receptors are actually receptors for
the NT acetylcholine. This image from NIDA shows bundles of five subunits in a
circle where the open core represents a channel for ions. This is just a rough
schematic of the receptors. Note that there are different kinds of subunits. One has
alpha-‐1 and beta-‐2, another is Alpha seven and so forth.
Each of these multiple subunits are produced by different genes. It’s been shown
that the occurrence of a certain SNP in the Alpha five subunit is associated with
pleasure from a first cigarette and with increased risk of dependence among early
smokers. So here is a link between the composition of the receptor for nicotine and
the likelihood that someone will become a smoker. It isn’t clear yet how the
occurrence of these subunits and SNPs create the vulnerability. But it’s a compelling
Plik z chomika:
steampunk
Inne pliki z tego folderu:
6 - 2 - Video 6.2- Risk Factors (9-43).mp4
(22498 KB)
6 - 1 - Video 6.1- Will I Become an Addict- (5-54).mp4
(15350 KB)
6 - 4 - Video 6.4- The Interaction of Vulnerabilities & Risk Factors (6-58).mp4
(14405 KB)
6 - 3 - Video 6.3- Self-Medication & Co-Morbidity (4-07).mp4
(10459 KB)
6 - 5 - Video 6.5- Environmental Risk Factors (4-20).mp4
(10864 KB)
Inne foldery tego chomika:
Week 1
Week 2
Week 3
Week 4
Week 5
Zgłoś jeśli
naruszono regulamin